Ikram
Rouissi
University
of Carthage, Tunisia
Abstract
The notion of communicative
competence goes beyond the acquisition of linguistic competence to include
pragmatic competence. Pragmatic competence is concerned with the use of
language according to context and culture. A lack in the development of
pragmatic competence may lead to communication breakdowns or cultural
misunderstandings (Kasper and Blum-Kulka, 1993). Acquiring an appropriate level
of pragmatic competence can be quite challenging because of the lack of clear
prescriptive rules and the transfer of L1 socio-cultural norms (Chick, 1996;
Cohen, 2007; Nakajima, 1997). Being primarily concerned with how non-native
speakers acquire second language pragmatic knowledge (Kapser, 199),
Interlanguage pragmatics has received a staple focus in second language
acquisition research. Against this background, the present paper, drawing upon
Brown and Levinson’s (1987) model of speech acts, investigates the realization of
requests among Saudi EFL learners and the effect of degree of imposition
enshrined therein in different eleven situations. Brown and Levinson maintain that Requests
constitute an imposition on the hearer’s negative face because they represent
an impingement on his freedom of action. They stress the role of three
variables: distance, power, and ranking of imposition in speech act
realization. The strategies posited in this framework for realizing
formal requests (i.e., negative politeness strategies) represent the analytical categories adopted in this study. The study reveals that Saudi learners show
a lot of care in not causing direct hits at their interlocutor’s negative face.
It also reveals a number of pragma-linguistic failures and suggests that they might
be better explained in terms of the learners’/speakers’ concern about their own
negative face. The study is intended to draw teachers’ attention to the
necessity of developing programs or courses which raise the learners’ awareness
about the performance of requests in a cross-culturally sound way.
Keywords: Interlanguage
pragmatics, Politeness, Negative Face, Requests, Variables, Distance, Power, Imposition, Speech Acts.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete