A Critical Linguistic Study of
the Representation of Islam and Muslims in the Discourse of the New York Times
Op-Eds
Rachid Acim
University Sultan Moulay Slimane Beni Mellal, Morocco
University Sultan Moulay Slimane Beni Mellal, Morocco
Abstract
The present paper aims at studying the ideological
discourse of the New York Times (and henceforth NYT) Op-Eds (originally short
form for “opposite the editorial page”, latterly known as “opinion editorial”)
written on Islam and Muslims, through the examination of linguistic structures
that are embedded in this opinion discourse. The linguistic analysis is based
on the theoretical framework of Critical Linguistics. Indeed, this analytical
tool puts much emphasis on the fundamental role and centrality of ideology in
articulating certain views and perceptions about Islam and Muslims. The data
collected follows non-random sampling and is retrieved from the NYT database
after three months of digital subscription. Within this journalistic discourse,
language is viewed more than a vehicle for communication; it is a carrier of
ideology, a site of struggle and an energy that transforms human experience
into expression, or say simply opinion. The inclusion and exclusion of certain
linguistic structures such as passive and active forms, the excessive use of
quasi-synonymous terms and lexical items, as well as the (re)occurrence of a
whole plethora of nominal constructions, suggest that a process of selection is
particular if not exclusive to the opinion discourse of the New York Times
Op-Eds addressing Islam and Muslims.
Keywords: The New York Times, Islam, Discourse,
Op-Eds, Ideology
No comments:
Post a Comment