Universal
Pragmatics as a Methodology for Analyzing Institutional Cultures
Gerry Schlenker
University of Sioux Falls, USA
Abstract
Habermas maintains that the democratic
nature of the public sphere can only be maintained within the context of the
ideal speech situation. Truth, in this framework, means democratically arrived
at consensus, free from domination. If consensus breaks down, that is if
validity claims cannot be vindicated because they have been critically
challenged, then truth claims may only be recovered through conditions of
discourse in argumentative reasoning.
This involves the cooperative search for
truth. If not allowed to progress because all participants have not been
allowed to raise or challenge truth claims involving the four speech acts, then
what results is a situation involving conflict and ideology. Conflict arises
when "consensus concerning distribution of opportunities for satisfying
needs breaks down" (Held 346).
What is necessary then is a critique of
ideology through the "considerations of universal pragmatics" in
order to determine the degree to which communicative action has given way to
strategic action and particular interests of a dominant group as opposed to the
generalizable interests of the entire community (Habermas 1979, 112-113).
It is therefore important to analyze the
normative structure of particular socio-cultural systems and institutions in order
to determine whether all participants have equal opportunities to employ all
speech acts including communicatives, representatives, regulatives, and
constatives. In the event that all actors are not able to employ and therefore
fulfill their obligations which are necessary for establishing the ideal speech
situation, then it is possible that what exists is a culture whose norms are
entirely disconnected from justification.
This paper suggests that Universal
Pragmatics as constructed by Habermas can be used as a practical methodology
for analyzing various institutional cultures.
Keywords: Habermas, Universal Pragmatics, Ideal Speech
Situation, Public Sphere, Culture, Democracy
No comments:
Post a Comment